[Moose-dev] Re: Issue 999 in moose-technology: VerveineJ: management of the anonymous class

I think it should be kept open - first, it is trivial to change how VerveineJ name the anonymous classes - second, it would be good that verveineJ and Moose agree on this point.

unless we decide to change the default name in Moose (in that case I would be for changing it accordingly in verveineJ)

nicoals

On 11/14/2013 09:25 PM, moose-technology@googlecode.com wrote:

Comment #5 on issue 999 by tu...@tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ: management of the anonymous class http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=999

The thing inside the brackets is the type of the parameter, I think. In any case, do we agree to close the issue and tackle the Enum one separately?