21 Oct
2008
21 Oct
'08
2:23 p.m.
Hi,
The convention is that the meta-description is added only to the
getter. The rationale is that you always need a getter, but you don't
always need a setter.
Cheers,
Doru
On Oct 21, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
do I have to put it also for the setBelongsto
do you distinguish setter and getter?
simon I fixed some belongsTo implementors.
On Oct 21, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen."
Hi Stef,
Take a look at: FAMIXNamedEntity>>belongsTo
Doru
On Oct 21, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
ok
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"We are all great at making mistakes."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
The Moose Finder relies on the Fame
descriptions.
It is just that we will have two such descriptions, one for
belongsTo
and one for container. They can both be followed. So, I would say
this
is not really an issue.
Then I have to metadescribed belongsTO ?
<MSE: ><derived>
?
can you tell me what is the magic incantation ?
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev