5 Nov
2013
5 Nov
'13
5:35 p.m.
Hi,
I finally isolated a sample from an MSE generated with inFAMIX:
((FAMIX.JavaSourceLanguage)
(FAMIX.Class (id: 773130)
(sourceAnchor (ref: 927058))
(parentPackage (ref: 773123))
(container (ref: 773125))
(name 'AbstractDataDom')
(isAbstract true)
)
(FAMIX.ParameterizedType (id: 773536)
(parameterizableClass (ref: 773130))
))
Importing this MSE will generate the error. The point is that the
FAMIXClass should be a FAMIXParameterizableClass instead. In fact this
manually corrected MSE works:
((FAMIX.JavaSourceLanguage)
(FAMIX.ParameterizableClass (id: 773130)
(sourceAnchor (ref: 927058))
(parentPackage (ref: 773123))
(container (ref: 773125))
(name 'AbstractDataDom')
(isAbstract true)
)
(FAMIX.ParameterizedType (id: 773536)
(parameterizableClass (ref: 773130))
))
the class is defined as:
public abstract class AbstractDataDom<D extends DTOBase, A> extends
AbstractDom {
Maybe I'm using an old version of inFamix (it should be from mid this
year), I will download a new one and I will try again.
Cheers,
Fabrizio
2013/9/9 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>
I have the feeling that this will happen to any
generic class in your
code.
Doru
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Fabrizio Perin <fabrizio.perin(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Hi Doru,
I tried to collect from the big MSE file only those elements which are
suppose to be responsible for the error. I check the name of the entities
in the debugger when it pop up. So far by importing only those elements the
error doesn't pop up, i will try again on monday.
Cheers,
Fabrizio
2013/9/7 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi,
The code as it is now is correct in Moose. If I understand correctly,
the issue is in inFamix. Did you manage to reproduce on a smaller case
study?
Cheers,
Doru
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Fabrizio Perin <
fabrizio.perin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
yes I'm trying to setup a fake mse to
reproduce my problem. As soon as
it is done i will commit the test.
cheers,
Fabrizio
2013/9/6 Diego Lont <diego.lont(a)delware.nl>
> Then we should ask Doru, for he has made some changes, that breaks
> your code. And maybe you can write a test that shows your problem?
>
> On Sep 6, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Fabrizio Perin wrote:
>
> Hello,
> just tried, still happen.
> For me only 72 seems to be working. I will let you know a soon as the
> import is done (if it will finish :) )
>
> cheers,
> Fabrizio
>
>
> 2013/9/6 Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl>
>
>> Could you try with .76?
>> Problem could also be in 74.
>> Working on our presentation for monday,
>> no time to look into it deeply now.
>>
>> Stephan & Diego
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev