15 Jun
2011
15 Jun
'11
8:54 p.m.
Doru,
Thanks for the answers!
You know that Moose 4 is really sexy and I intend to port the core of
Softwarenaut to Pharo, only that I am waiting for the right time and the
right person to help me with that :) And maybe that time is soon :))
Cheers,
M.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi Mircea,
I think that what Stef wants to say is that with all the great features we
put in Moose 4.*, we must be doing a very bad job at marketing to not be
able to convince someone to use it :)
But, yes, it is unlikely that someone will ever maintain FAMIX 2.1-based
tools.
Cheers,
Doru
On 10 Jun 2011, at 09:08, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Mircea
you send us a pretty bad message. In essence that all the efforts we
spent over
the last years are useless.
How this is possible that you are not interested
in all the efforts we
did?
Famix 2.1 is dead since a long time and we will
not maintain it at ALL!
Stef
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Beauty is where we see it."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi guys,
Anybody used the C# importer recently? Do you know
if it exports in FAMIX 2.1? I'm a bit behind the trend with
Softwarenaut and would like to apply it on a case study :)
Cheers,
M.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev