16 Apr
2009
16 Apr
'09
11:11 p.m.
not yet.
David, we should push your extension in OB.
What extension do you mean exactly?
Everything from OB-Mondrian-Diagrams? This will always be dependent on
Mondrian and hence not be part of OB-Enhancements or even of an OB-core
package.
If you mean more specific functionality of OB-Mondrian-Diagrams, then we can
discuss to integrate it in OB-Enhancements. This depends on what exactly.
Note that OB-Mondrian-Diagrams is part of OB in the sense that people can
load it as any other OB package to extend OB.
David
I used it, it
seems to be robust enough. We must be sure that it is
independent from Mondrian.
This is on my todo list...
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 16 Apr 2009, at 21:45, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
I do not really get it.
This extension of OB is not part of OB?
Stef
On Apr 16, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Together with Simon and David, we enhanced the OB-based Moose
> browser. This was enabled with the last extension of OB to render
> morphs.
> This means that in addition to Fame and OB, you need to load OB-
> Mondrian-Diagrams from wiresong _before_ loading Moose-All.
> MooseLoader and PersonalSettings are updated.
>
> When we will have The MooseBrowser based on Glamour, this
requirement
will
probably be relaxed.
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.