10 Mar
2013
10 Mar
'13
10:14 p.m.
From that perspective, pharo would love to get the
collection extensions done in Moose.
But we never got the time to look at them +
test.
Now it would be a good move.
I will try to get some time for this task but if someone wants to do it it would be cool.
Stef
On Mar 10, 2013, at 8:58 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
There are a number of dirty packages in the Moose image. Most of these are due to us
loading packages with extensions that are now present in Pharo 2.0.
I removed:
- BDDExtensions as a prerequisite to Glamour because it is already present in the image
- I removed an Morph extension from Glamour
- I removed a couple of methods from Mondrian that were extending Behavior and
CompiledMethod
There are still a couple left:
- Moose-TestResources is dirty for some reason I do not understand, but I suspect it has
to do with the latest CategoryImporter tests. Yuriy, could you take a look?
- Object>>asMorph comes from Magritte and should be renamed to asMagritteMorph
- some extensions from Grease were adopted by Pharo
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Beauty is where we see it."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev