Hi,
On 25 May 2011, at 09:08, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
I reported the pyramid. After there were in my flow so I closed them. Now I can take 10 min on browsing verveineJ model and produce them. I imagine that somebody has to use this interface. I think that we should all think if we want to succeed or not. I mean yes I can do what I'm told (cyrille), or do my experience (jannik), or fix mondrian (alex) but if nobody spend 1 hour to try to analyse a Java project then we will have bugs.
I do use Moose, and Usman and Andre too. But we use it to compute metrics, very little to browse source code.
and last time we used it was a month ago (ICSM deadline ...) and we used the version before changes to the meta-model, the one that worked.
since then we had significant changes to Famix (this is why Jannik asked for a 4.0 release) that left things in an unstable state. Problem lies somewhere in underestimating the impact of the changes to Famix. It should probably have been considered a development version so that it is clearer what one was dealing with.
The issue is like I mentioned before: The Cook API is broken and needs revision. The larger problem is that we do not have tests that capture the problems.
Cheers, Doru
nicolas _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"One cannot do more than one can do."