29 Jun
2014
29 Jun
'14
7 a.m.
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Ben Coman <btc(a)openinworld.com> wrote:
Tudor Girba wrote:
The full name was Glamorous Toolkit :). But, you can think of Great Toolkit
as well :). The main reason for G is that it is based on Glamour.
We have half of it :).
The MooseIDE is called GToolkit.
As an aside, I think "MooseIDE" has a nice feel to it.
"GToolkit" has never really grabbed me. Is it an end user interface?
The term "Toolkit" doesn't sound like it. And what does the "G"
stand for?
Would "MooseBase" be more conventional than
"MooseInfrastructure"?
Hmmm... makes me think of "MoonBase" for no good reason.
MooseInfrastructure is not a good name. We should use MooseEngines.
Doru
cheers -ben
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"