What we did in Glamour was to attach to each
Presentation a kind of
default interaction. In your example, I would make #mouseEnter,
#mouseClick ... default ports that are populated when the
corresponding interactions happen on a graph element.
Then of course, these ports will belong to graph elements. Like this
transmissions are created between the ports of a graph element.
Perhaps there will also be a need to identify graph elements by name
so that you can refer to them from outside the context of a script.
Why not having ports that belong to an interaction instead? Consider
the following script:
view nodes: (1 to: 1000).
Figure selection will imply a transmission between the root and each
of these nodes. It could be a single transmission between 'root
interaction' and the unique interaction of the nodes?
Alexandre
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"What we can governs what we wish."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.