19 Nov
2013
19 Nov
'13
9:49 a.m.
Are you sure? ;) Take a look at the #customization protocol of my Tree Map!
Methods like #fillNode: aNode withColor: aColorOrAblock do exactly what you are looking
for ;)
Cheers,
R
On Nov 18, 2013, at 9:04 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Subclassing is not really an option. Roassal is a core
component that should remain small.
But, let's talk specifics. For example, defining the colorBlock: is a global action.
Thus, if I want to define the color for multiple types of nodes I have to use an if in
there. This is less ideal.
The alternative would be to use the same pattern that is used in the MondrianBuilder and
apply the color to every nodes: instruction. In this way we could handle multiple node
types without any ifs.
The same should be valid for every customization in the treemap.
Cheers,
Doru
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Roberto Minelli <roberto.minelli(a)usi.ch> wrote:
Well,
We could discuss about it, also with Alex, for example.
One thing which is possible is to subclass the builder and extend it with new features,
such that the original code will be consistent with its behavior.
Cheers,
Roby
On Nov 15, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
Ok. I might give it a try but that will imply that some of the existing code will have a
different behavior because it is too restrictive in the way it is now.
Cheers,
Doru
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Roberto Minelli <roberto.minelli(a)usi.ch> wrote:
Hi Doru,
Happy that you played with my ROTreeMapBuilder!
I’d be interested to extend it, but not anytime soon.
At the moment the tree map builder suits my needs and I am focusing on using it on my
data ;)
Cheers,
Roby
On Nov 15, 2013, at 6:29 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
I played a bit with the ROTreeMapBuilder, and there are two things that came to mind and
that would be nice to extend. I opened some issues:
- Support for multiple types of nodes.
https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1002
- Default weight should be 1.
https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1003
- Circular treemap
https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1004
@Roberto: Would you be interested in working on something like this?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev