17 May
2012
17 May
'12
10:10 p.m.
I am absolutely for in principle. However there is no good way to manage many packages.
Adding or removing a dependent package is just painful. It also significantly increase the
loading time.
So yes, we will split Roassal, but not right now :-)
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On May 17, 2012, at 3:28 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
Moose was the first user of RPackage, and RPackage works best when we have one package
per category.
Roassal does not comply to this requirement, but it should because I want Moose to
continue to be a good RPackage citizen :).
Alex, could you take care of splitting it?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"The coherence of a trip is given by the clearness of the goal."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev