25 Jul
2012
25 Jul
'12
12:45 a.m.
Hello all,
Rapidly sharing some points with you guys regarding Synectique and this
community...
- VerveinJ should be available to you guys to conduct your experiments,
extract MSEs and save them. As Stef mentioned, it should be free and open
to use for the people in the community. This is because VJ has improved a
lot because of the feedback from the community and we do not want to lose
this precious loop.
- Synectique is transitioning from "not-sure" to "looks interesting"
phase
so from September we should start to look for appropriate usage licences
for VerveineJ so that will clarify the "not sure" situation around VJ.
- May be this is pharo-related issue but very soon we need to look for a
database to store analysis results because i) we need to store a lot of
data ii) we do not want to get into resolving issues related to data
consistency, concurrent accesses, data merging, etc.
- Companies working in the domain of software analysis have this constant
size problem: very soon we will face it too. Since, this community gathers
some of the most exp. people in software analysis, it would be good to see
how we can innovate in Moose to resolve the problem.
And thanx a lot for all the tools created in this community that serves us
as enabling techno. Currently, we might not have sufficient time to improve
the Moose infrastructure as we would like to but the least we can do is to
contribute with our feedback on the tools and improve them whenever we can.
regards,
Usman
www.synectique.eu
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:38 PM, jannik.laval <jannik.laval(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
On Jul 24, 2012, at 9:23 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
---
Jannik Laval
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>
>> I'm sorry but we do not want to give everything for free all the time.
>
> :) it was just a joke.
> I want to say that I am not sure the message is good: "you can use
Moose,
it is open-source, but must pay for importing data".
> You are right, this is a commercial message,
and maybe it is a bonus
for Synectique...
It is not a bonus. It is important. Our goal is to make sure that our
company gets
a chance in face of the too many companies in the field.
> Now, I have a researcher point of view and I think that using a tool
that is
open source is easier than contacting guys and maybe they answer or
not. And if not ? I will use another tool.
did you send an email and did not get an answer?
I guess not so there is
no problem.
Not from you, but we are experimenting some tools and guys do not answers
about their tools... so not possible to compare.
I think that having a company around moose is the
best that can happen
to Moose even if it can make the system more complex.
If we play smart everybody can benefit from it.
If synectique fails then it will be far easier but much sadder.
You are probably right.
And I hope the best for Synectique.
Jannik
I only give my opinion on something that does not
concern me directly.
:)
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev