Good spotting!
There is no reason other than somebody did not do it. Please open an issue, and commit the fix.
Cheers, Doru
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Fabrizio Perin fabrizio.perin@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I figured that parentBehaviouralEntity was implemented like that:
FAMIXLacalVariable>>parentBehaviouralEntity <MSEProperty: #parentBehaviouralEntity type: #FAMIXBehaviouralEntity> <MSEComment: 'Behavioural entity declaring this local variable. belongsTo implementation'>
^parentBehaviouralEntity
The opposite is missing. Is there a reason for that?
Shouldn't it be like: FAMIXLacalVariable>>parentBehaviouralEntity <MSEProperty: #parentBehaviouralEntity type: #FAMIXBehaviouralEntity opposite: #localVariables> <MSEComment: 'Behavioural entity declaring this local variable. belongsTo implementation'>
^parentBehaviouralEntity
Cheers, Fabrizio
2012/3/28 Fabrizio Perin fabrizio.perin@gmail.com
Hi, I imported a Model generated with InFamix and i tried to navigate the model with the MooseFinder. Once I click on class the debugger opens with a MNU: receiver of "classScope" is nil. In fact FAMIXLacalVariable>>belongsTo returns nil.
Anybody have the same problem?
Cheers, Fabrizio
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev