28 Mar
2012
28 Mar
'12
11:20 a.m.
Good spotting!
There is no reason other than somebody did not do it. Please open an
issue, and commit the fix.
Cheers,
Doru
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Fabrizio Perin
<fabrizio.perin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I figured that parentBehaviouralEntity was implemented like that:
FAMIXLacalVariable>>parentBehaviouralEntity
<MSEProperty: #parentBehaviouralEntity type: #FAMIXBehaviouralEntity>
<MSEComment: 'Behavioural entity declaring this local variable.
belongsTo implementation'>
^parentBehaviouralEntity
The opposite is missing. Is there a reason for that?
Shouldn't it be like:
FAMIXLacalVariable>>parentBehaviouralEntity
<MSEProperty: #parentBehaviouralEntity type: #FAMIXBehaviouralEntity
opposite: #localVariables>
<MSEComment: 'Behavioural entity declaring this local variable.
belongsTo implementation'>
^parentBehaviouralEntity
Cheers,
Fabrizio
2012/3/28 Fabrizio Perin <fabrizio.perin(a)gmail.com>
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Hi,
I imported a Model generated with InFamix and i tried to navigate the
model with the MooseFinder. Once I click on class the debugger opens with a
MNU: receiver of "classScope" is nil. In fact
FAMIXLacalVariable>>belongsTo
returns nil.
Anybody have the same problem?
Cheers,
Fabrizio
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev