Theoretically yes. In practice: - The Glamour configuration does not have proper versioning numbers (and basically no real way to update those numbers properly). It would be great to get one working, but it is also important to have it working within the whole of Moose, which is not so easy apparently. Would you like to work on this? - Working in the same repository for two versions of Pharo will create a mess with the numbering scheme. I would be happy to be proved wrong.
Cheers, Doru
On 7 Feb 2012, at 21:41, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
I don't think so... but why wait? we can create a new metacello config to deal with 1.4 without harm 1.3.
best, Esteban
El 07/02/2012, a las 4:27p.m., Tudor Girba escribió:
Hi Esteban,
Sounds great. Are the changes compatible with 1.3? If not, I would prefer to wait until Moose is out. Any day now.
Cheers, Doru
On 7 Feb 2012, at 17:39, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
Hi,
I made glamour to load on pharo 1.4... now, I have some errors on tests (17), most of them because MorphTreeMorph>>#mouseUp:onMorph: does not exists anymore. I don't know how to fix that. Should I commit my changes anyway, and hope some benevolent developer to fix that (Doru?)
best, Esteban
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Presenting is storytelling."