8 Feb
2012
8 Feb
'12
7:50 a.m.
Theoretically yes. In practice:
- The Glamour configuration does not have proper versioning numbers (and basically no real
way to update those numbers properly). It would be great to get one working, but it is
also important to have it working within the whole of Moose, which is not so easy
apparently. Would you like to work on this?
- Working in the same repository for two versions of Pharo will create a mess with the
numbering scheme. I would be happy to be proved wrong.
Cheers,
Doru
On 7 Feb 2012, at 21:41, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
I don't think so... but why wait? we can create a
new metacello config to deal with 1.4 without harm 1.3.
best,
Esteban
El 07/02/2012, a las 4:27p.m., Tudor Girba escribió:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Presenting is storytelling."
Hi Esteban,
Sounds great. Are the changes compatible with 1.3? If not, I would prefer to wait until
Moose is out. Any day now.
Cheers,
Doru
On 7 Feb 2012, at 17:39, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
I made glamour to load on pharo 1.4... now, I have some errors on tests (17), most of
them because MorphTreeMorph>>#mouseUp:onMorph: does not exists anymore.
I don't know how to fix that. Should I commit my changes anyway, and hope some
benevolent developer to fix that (Doru?)
best,
Esteban
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev