Hi,
Indeed, the only dependency to MooseDevelopment was the use of the SCG.Moose namespace.
So, I moved all classes in a namespace called StoreIt, and as the importer uses some collection classes from CodeFoo, StoreIt also imports the CodeFoo namespace. StoreIt is just a temporary name, and you can rename it if you want.
I also removed the dependency to MooseDevelopment and added dependency to CodeFooDevelopment.
Hope this helps.
Cheers, Doru
On Jun 6, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
That's an error, MooseStore should be a stand alone. Actually, even the name is wrong, it was meant and developed as a standalone package, not related to Moose in any way. Hence, go ahead an remove that prereq.
cheers, AA
On 6 Jun 2007, at 9:31 , Mircea Lungu wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have seen that MooseDevelopment is set as a prerequisite to MooseStore even if there seems to be no obvious reason for it.
I would like to use the model defined in MooseStore also for the Project Observatory but it seems awkward to ask the user to load all moose when all that is actually needed is the MooseStore package...
Can you see a solution? :)
Mircea.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- Tudor Girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/
"Every thing should have the right to be different."