I understand that the rational behind this, is to populate stubs with the maximum amount of information. Is this a problem however?
Cheers, Alexandre
On Oct 2, 2014, at 6:39 AM, Damien Cassou damien.cassou@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Imagine I have a package Super with a class Super and a package Sub with a class Sub that inherits from Super.
If I create a moose model of the package Super, I get the class Sub as a stub. I find that very surprising: why are all subclasses of the system included in the model. The semantics of the inheritance relation is one-way: a class knows its super class, not the opposite.
Can somebody explain why subclasses are included in the analyses?
-- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." Winston Churchill _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev