30 May
2011
30 May
'11
4:52 p.m.
Hi,
I have been working in visualization examples of complexity, inner nodes,
and distribution map. I used for these examples the second option that we
discuss previously. The examples are in the attachment.
Cheers
Santiago
2011/5/27 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>
Hi,
You should go for both options.
Start with 2, and for 1, you will create new MondrianLayouts that will only
work directly with Protovis.
Cheers,
Doru
On 27 May 2011, at 19:02, Santiago Vidal wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be
done."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Ing. Santiago A. Vidal
ISISTAN Research Institute
UNICEN University
Paraje Arroyo Seco
Campus Universitario
(B7001BBO) Tandil,
Bs. As. - Argentina
Phone: 54 2293 439840 Ext. 42
Fax: 54 2293 439681
Email: svidal(a)exa.unicen.edu.ar
http://www.exa.unicen.edu.ar/~svidal
I don't know yet. In principle I'm going
to implement the drag & drop
behavior. In going to try to make an example using
the Mondrian
representation for Monday.
2011/5/27 Johan Fabry <jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl>
I agree with Alex, but I have a question: how do you plan to handle
interactions,
more specifically node replacement operations?
On 27 May 2011, at 12:22, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> I feel we should opt for 2).
> We should export the visualization using Protovis, not recoding
Mondrian in
Protovis.
>
> Alexandre
>
>
> On 27 May 2011, at 12:19, Santiago Vidal wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I have been working in the visualization of the inner nodes. In
general I
have 2 options to work with protovis:
>> • Be independent of the data by
means of the use of Protovis
Layouts.
>> • Copy the same visualization that
is used by Mondrian. That is
create a Protovis canvas of the same size that the
canvas of Mondrian and
place each shape in Protovis in the same location that in the canvas of
Mondrian.
>> While the first option is more
modifiable than the second, it implies
the creation of new layouts when they are
needed.
>> The main advantage of the second option
is that the generated html
file could be interactive (such as the example that I
send before). However,
it doesn't improve the graphics generated by Mondrian.
> What
do you think is the best option?
> Cheers
> Santiago
--
Johan Fabry
jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Ing. Santiago A. Vidal
ISISTAN Research Institute
UNICEN University
Paraje Arroyo Seco
Campus Universitario
(B7001BBO) Tandil,
Bs. As. - Argentina
Phone: 54 2293 439840 Ext. 42
Fax: 54 2293 439681
Email: svidal(a)exa.unicen.edu.ar
http://www.exa.unicen.edu.ar/~svidal
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev