Cheers,
Andrei
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kubelka(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 1, 2015, at 17:47, Andrei Chis <chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Mariano
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Andrei Chis <chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
> marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Uhhh that's very cool. Quick question, what happens if the textual
>> representation of the actual vs expected is the same yet the objects are
>> not #= ?
>> It shows no diff and then I must go to see the inspector?
>>
>
> These textual representations can be customized per each object type,
> however if they are the same now it just shows the diff pane with no
> differences.
> Another idea would be to also show two inspectors side-by-side apart
> from the diff.
>
A side-by-side inspector would be another really cool addition for when
the string comparison won't work.
> Then even if you see or not a difference in the textual diff, you
> could use the inspector to look at differences between the state.
> Also right now the diff is textual. Adding better diff widgets for
> specific data types would help.
>
>
Oh yes. But I think that adding a side-by-side inspector would be a
great second step in which you know you can always fall back no matter
which kind of object.
I added two side by side inspectors. I still need to improve/disable
navigation in these embedded inspectors
<debugger.png>
BTW...since we are near Christmas... it would be terrific to have a
button somewhere to show/hide the #setUp method besides the code
representing the piece of stack you clicked. Sometimes when I am debugging
test failures that had a setup I always have to open another window with
the setup because I don't remember everything I did there and that's useful
information to understand what a test could have failed. There was a
Nautilus plugin for that some time ago.
Sounds like an useful feature. I'll give a try implementing it. Or if
you are faster you can give it a try :)
I like the idea. Maybe having a ‘setUp tab; next to ‘Source’ tab
whenever we browse a test case object in debugger? Or it could be part of
the inspector the same way you did ‘Diff’ tab.
I think the MAIN point for me is to be able to see the setUp AT THE SAME
time with the code of the failing error. If I have to click another tab to
see the setup and then another click to go back to see my test, then I gain
nothing. Maybe splitting (either vertically or horizontally) the area where
now you see the method source (of the selected stack) in order to also see
(fixed) the setUp ? Or .. maybe a new tab in the below (expected vs
current, etc) called "setUp". That way, at least I can see the method and
the setUp all together (Ok, I cannot see the expected vs current, but ok)
Cheers,
Juraj
Cheers,
Andrei
Cheers,
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch