[Moose-dev] Re: metamodel from Smalltalk Code

> Hey Stef and Sara, > > sound like a heisenbug :) how do you check if the package is empty or > not later on? because the preferred way to do that is by calling > #classes, which would initialize the package. > > AA > > On 13 Aug 2007, at 15:40 , sellossa(a)ensieta.fr wrote: > >> Hi Adrian >> >> This is stef typing. I'm looking at the code of sara and I see the >> following behavior: >> >> generateEcoreString:aNamespace >> |package | >> >> "aNamespace asMetaDescription classes." >> package:=aNamespace asMetaDescription. >> package acceptMetamodelVisitor: self. >> ^ rootXmlElement printString. >> >> >> If we remove the comments the code works, but if we run it like it is >> ie package is empty (otherwise it contains the right meta >> descriptions). >> >> I think that the design is not good. The programmer should not >> guess that >> a query is doing something magic in his back. Could you change that? >> At the minimum call classes initializeSomething >> >> Stef >> >>> Hey Sara, >>> >>> the issue is fixed, now you can say >>> >>> SCG.Moose asMetaDescription classes >>> >>> and get all meta-descriptions of all classes without the annoying >>> initialize loop. >>> >>> PS: next week I am in Berlin, I might not have time to fix bugs, but >>> I am usually available via mail. >>> >>> cheers, >>> AA >>> >>> On 27 Jul 2007, at 15:32 , sellossa(a)ensieta.fr wrote: >>> >>>> hello, >>>> >>>> why, when I do: SCG.Moose asMetaDescription, I get sthing different >>>> from when I do: SCG.Moose allClasses do: #asMetaDescription. >>>> ^SCG.Moose asMetaDescription >>>> >>>> Stef find it terrible! >>>> >>>> sara >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > >