Hi,
The Glamour API is intended to be an internal DSL. This is particularly useful for people
that do not know Smalltalk :)
What parts of the API is not user friendly for you?
Regarding the ToolBuilder vs Glamour issue, ToolBuilder is a User Interface framework,
while Glamour is a browser engine. To give you an idea, with the ToolBuilder, you place
buttons in a window. With Glamour, you define the data flow and the way data is presented
at a higher level.
Regarding examples, what kind of things are you interested in?
Cheers,
Doru
On 4 Nov 2010, at 14:43, Hannes Hirzel wrote:
Actually the Glamour API could be considered to be an
internal DSL to
describe browsers. I assume that a forth and five iteration are
necessary to make it more user friendly. That is the reason why I did
not pursue Glamour this May. I thought instead of going for Glamour I
can just go through the effort of learning the ToolBuilder builder DSL
-- which in the end is not more difficult either.
A note aside: Maybe I push the idea of DSL too much here. The question
is: where do we talk about an API and where does the DSL idea start?
However --- though there are alot examples -- even more example will
help and I recently enjoyed trying out some of them in the
Moose-Glamour-Image.
--Hannes
On 11/4/10, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
no ooooooooooooo
Don't limit yourself show us your errors
your errors are coool
Glamour API should be better :)
Stef
On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Benjamin wrote:
Ouups :s
I'll try to open my both eyes before sending a mail now :)
Thank you
Ben
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"It's not how it is, it is how we see it."