1 Apr
2013
1 Apr
'13
10:23 p.m.
Hi,
What choice exactly? You mean why have FAMIX statically typed? Actually, it is not. Only
its description in terms of Fame is. And one of the reasons why Fame is rather strongly
typed is to make it easier to have it in funny languages like Java.
But, now that we are at it, declared types are not bad as long as they only affect tools
and do not interfere with compilation and runtime.
Cheers,
Doru
On Apr 1, 2013, at 10:10 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <nicolas.anquetil(a)inria.fr> wrote:
Famix can be seen as a statically typed language.
For example Invocation is an association between two behaviouralEntities (if I recall
correctly).
The question that bugs me is why (or how) die-hard smalltalkers [ :-) ] ended-up making
that choice?
nicolas
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Problem solving should be focused on describing
the problem in a way that makes the solution obvious."