I don't know yet. In principle I'm going to implement the drag & drop behavior. In going to try to make an example using the Mondrian representation for Monday.
2011/5/27 Johan Fabry jfabry@dcc.uchile.cl
I agree with Alex, but I have a question: how do you plan to handle interactions, more specifically node replacement operations?
On 27 May 2011, at 12:22, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I feel we should opt for 2). We should export the visualization using Protovis, not recoding Mondrian
in Protovis.
Alexandre
On 27 May 2011, at 12:19, Santiago Vidal wrote:
Hi, I have been working in the visualization of the inner nodes. In general
I have 2 options to work with protovis:
• Be independent of the data by means of the use of ProtovisLayouts.
• Copy the same visualization that is used by Mondrian. That iscreate a Protovis canvas of the same size that the canvas of Mondrian and place each shape in Protovis in the same location that in the canvas of Mondrian.
While the first option is more modifiable than the second, it implies
the creation of new layouts when they are needed.
The main advantage of the second option is that the generated html file
could be interactive (such as the example that I send before). However, it doesn't improve the graphics generated by Mondrian.
What do you think is the best option? Cheers Santiago
-- Johan Fabry jfabry@dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev