I agree with Alex, but I have a question: how do you plan to handle interactions, more specifically node replacement operations?
On 27 May 2011, at 12:22, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> I feel we should opt for 2).
> We should export the visualization using Protovis, not recoding Mondrian in Protovis.
>
> Alexandre
>
>
> On 27 May 2011, at 12:19, Santiago Vidal wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I have been working in the visualization of the inner nodes. In general I have 2 options to work with protovis:
>> • Be independent of the data by means of the use of Protovis Layouts.
>> • Copy the same visualization that is used by Mondrian. That is create a Protovis canvas of the same size that the canvas of Mondrian and place each shape in Protovis in the same location that in the canvas of Mondrian.
>> While the first option is more modifiable than the second, it implies the creation of new layouts when they are needed.
>> The main advantage of the second option is that the generated html file could be interactive (such as the example that I send before). However, it doesn't improve the graphics generated by Mondrian.
>> What do you think is the best option?
>> Cheers
>> Santiago
--
Johan Fabry
jfabry@dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile