27 Apr
2011
27 Apr
'11
10:38 a.m.
Hi,
On 27 Apr 2011, at 03:23, Dale Henrichs wrote:
On Apr 26, 2011, at 5:27 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
I re-read the original mail, and indeed there is enough information :). I will try to give
it a try. What I saw is that there is basically no dependency between steps. Is that
correct? If yes, then all steps would fit in a simple Magritte form.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"It's not how it is, it is how we see it."
Hi Dale,
On 27 Apr 2011, at 02:22, Dale Henrichs wrote:
okay? On 04/26/2011 05:01 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Not really :). Hi Dale,
Glamour is independent from the rendering, just like Omnibrowser is. Here is a short
description:
http://www.themoosebook.org/book/internals/glamour/rendering
We already have a working Seaside rendering code for the basic widgets of Glamour. For an
example, take the following steps:
1. download
http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-with-glamour-seaside/lastSucces…
2. run:
WAKom startOn: 8081
3. go to:
http://localhost:8081/moose/metaBrowser
Cheers,
Doru
I'll hold off exploring the scope of the Glamour port until I see if Glamour can be
used to construct the configuration wizard:)
I'm not skeptical as much as I am very busy...
Did I provide you with enough info for the use case?