It is a bit different actually.
Consider the script: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= view shape rectangle width: #numberOfMethods; height: [ :cls | cls numberOfVariables * 7 ]. view nodes: Collection withAllSubclasses. view layout: (RORectanglePackLayout new padding: 4). -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
It gives:
With no padding -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= view shape rectangle width: #numberOfMethods; height: [ :cls | cls numberOfVariables * 7 ]. view nodes: Collection withAllSubclasses. view layout: (RORectanglePackLayout new). -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
With Mathieu layout we have: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= view shape rectangle width: #numberOfMethods; height: [ :cls | cls numberOfVariables * 7 ]. view nodes: Collection withAllSubclasses. view layout: (RORectanglePackLayout new). -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Results are quite different
Alexandre
On Oct 15, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Nicolas Anquetil Nicolas.Anquetil@inria.fr wrote:
very nice :-)
Didn't Mathieu Dehouck develop a similar layout this summer ?
nicolas
On 10/15/2013 06:09 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
Hi everyone!
You know, some times you have a pile of different rectangles representing some entities. And you want to show them to someone so that he can take a look at them to assess something. But there is always a question how do you arrange this rectangles? Usually it's not practical to place them in a line or in a circle because it takes too much space. I've developed a layout that tries to pack rectangles in a compact space, and here is how it looks like:
<Mail Attachment.png>
You can load it into your image with: Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'YuriyTymchuk' project: 'RecPack-Layout'; package: 'RecPack-Layout'; load.
and you can see a couple of examples in Roassal easel.
Feedback is appreciated.
Cheers! Uko
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- Nicolas Anquetil -- RMod research team (Inria)
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
