[Moose-dev] Re: Anyone can explain this PParser behaviour?

Le 1 févr. 2016 à 08:09, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr&gt; a écrit : >> >> Where? because I spent a couple of hours I only found SQL92 > > http://savage.net.au/SQL/ <http://savage.net.au/SQL/> > > SQL-92, -99, -2003 Excellent! Thanks I will archive that.

> >>> But the point wasn't that; what a LALR/LR parser gives you is a >>> grammar ambiguity and conflicts... PetitParser will happily take your >>> grammar ans you will only discover when parsing something that it >>> doesn't do what you would like. >>> >>> (The reference citation of Aho and Ullman is ... it may be difficult >>> to determine what the language is). >>> >>> So since you have a grammar, use LALR to check it. >> >> But as I said we do not have it. > > You do have a PEG grammar in your PetitParser efforts, since you have been working on it. From far, those grammars are very much like other grammars... just that the parser generator behave differently when you have conflicts and ambiguity. > > Thierry > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch > https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev <https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev>