19 Sep
2011
19 Sep
'11
11:36 a.m.
Time is the key issue.
I spent some time during my holidays working on metrics.
Since I needed some of them, I started to look how they could be expressed in MooseChef
(my goal would be to drop MooseCook, which has far too many methods to my taste)
Anyway, I did a bit of work, but since I am back, I did not even find the time to commit
it in Monticello ! :-(
(same thing with the small XML issue I reported in august)
Very stupid situation and very sad
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: "Tudor Girba"
<tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>
À: "Moose-related development" <moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch>
Envoyé: Lundi 19 Septembre 2011 11:07:46
Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Moose community call
Please, let's put ultimatums aside. The issue is not
allPropertySelectors, and not even problems in the core (which
actually are not that many). It would be great indeed to have more
comments, and I would welcome any effort in this direction.
However, the main issue is collaboration around the infrastructure.
Everyone is working in his own corner with very little integration and
collaboration happening. I can coordinate the work and spread
knowledge around, but only if people work with me.
We started to get this regular chats with the Cyrille and Andre, and
things improved. But, then holidays came and we are again in
no-communication land. I actually do not even know if someone is still
working on Moose-something.
The reason I called for projects was to try to establish a sense of
common goals, but it was clear that this is not desired. Moose was
developed by relentlessly integrating and on building on each others
efforts. Right now I am the only one investing in maintaining core and
seeing that things work with each other.
I work well with Alex who does a great job of maintaining Mondrian,
but these kind of collaborations should be broader.
So, here is a proposal:
Who wants to join the core team?
Right now we have:
• Stef
• Me
• Simon
• Alex
Joining the core team would imply investing at least 2h / week on
actually working on the infrastructure, and on cleaning it.
Simon, I am not sure if you are interested in this anymore. Stef, do
you have the time to do it? Alex, do you want to work on more than
Mondrian? I certainly will continue.
Cheers,
Doru
On 19 Sep 2011, at 09:36, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi moosers
I would like to know if you are interested in Moose?
Why because the comments are not good.
Now this is simple either we let moose decay (I can focus on Pharo
easily) or we do something
Now I should know what you can do and energy you can put on the
table because there is little use
we get a new engineer and postdoc (because if the core is not clean
than nobody can learn from it).
So
Plan A- build a roadmap and do it (I can probably work every two
evenings on it for a month).
Right now (this evening we log on chat and we fix) these two
allPropertySelectors
is used
allDeclaredProperties
is used
FamixCore class comments
Plan B - I focus only on pharo (because I cannot do both especially
right now).
But I should know because we are hiring a new engineer and a new
postdoc for moose and without a community effort
I do not see the point.
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev