Hi,
Thanks. But, I meant to say that the packages should have a suffix. For example: Glamour-Morphic-Renderer-AndreiChis.324 should ideally be Glamour-Morphic-Renderer-Moose51-AndreiChis.324
Otherwise, we can also create a conflicting package with the one from the main repo of Glamour. For example, right now, we have in the Glamour repo: Glamour-Morphic-Renderer-SeanDeNigris.324
Luckily, in this case, the version was committed by Sean, but this could well have been committed by Andrei, and then we would have had a mess when using the local package cache (because we would have had 2 different implementations using the same file name).
So, all versions committed in the Moose51 repo, should have a Moose51 suffix.
Is that Ok? Could you republish the two packages with the Moose51 suffix?
Cheers, Doru
Cheers, Doru
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi,
Just a note: please still prefix the versions with a Moose51 suffix because we should not confuse them with the ones from the regular repository.
I created the two versions:
ConfigurationOfGlamourCore>>version313Moose51: (new #stable) ConfigurationOfRubric>>version1214Moose51:
they are loading correctly in the latest build and the bug is fixed.
regards.
Cheers, Doru
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Andrei Chis chisvasileandrei@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
As I mentioned when we released 5.1, we should create a separate repo for committing code packages with fixes for 5.1. The configuration remains in the same place and we will create a new version that will point to the new packages.
@Usman: could you create the moose/moose51 repo?
MCHttpRepository location: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Moose/Moose51/main' user: '' password: ''
@Andrei, can you commit the fix(es) in the repo? I see how to correct the problem in Glamour renderer but I do not understand what checks you would wish to introduce in Rubric for default theme colors.
I committed the two fixes. Can you update the configurations?
Yes. I'm doing it now.
Cheers, Andrei
Doru
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
On 04 Sep 2015, at 12:34, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:49 AM, stephan stephan@stack.nl wrote:
> > > On 04-09-15 11:42, Usman Bhatti wrote: > >> A new version only will not solve the problem. The fix also needs >> to be committed somewhere and if I commit the fix it in the main branch >> (see screenshot below), I need to merge all the the changes done for Moose >> 6.0 (and update other packages that these packages depend on) and hence >> break my tools in Moose 5.1. >> > Why? The only thing you are depending on is that #bleedingEdge > returns a version for Moose 6, isn't it?
No. We are using the stable version of Moose (release Moose 5.1) for Pharo 4.0 and not the bleeding edge.
> > > Stephan > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev