16 Aug
2010
16 Aug
'10
9:07 p.m.
I think it has plenty to do with code.
I would actually love to have the line number of an invocation or an
access. But, I guess in reality this does not work well because it
basically doubles the size of the model in terms of objects. So, I
like the suggestion of Simon.
Cheers,
Doru
On 16 Aug 2010, at 18:27, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Indeed. It looks strange to me as well. As said in its
class
comment, FAMIXAssociation is about linking two famix entities. It
has no much to do with source.
Side question, by its variables are named 'previous' and 'next'? Why
not 'source' and 'target'?
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 16 Aug 2010, at 11:47, Simon Denier wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Beauty is where we see it."
I just noticed that FamixAssociation is a subclass of
FamixSourcedEntity and as such, inherits a sourceAnchor field.
To me, it sounds like we could define
FamixAssociation>>sourceAnchor as a redirection:
FamixAssociation>>sourceAnchor
^ self from sourceAnchor
Indeed, an association is defined by the from side entity.
Is there any practical case where we want to link a dedicated
SourceAnchor object to an Association?
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev