Hi,
We should.
However, for the next version, I would propose to change Fame to not depend on this annotation but create one by default. The idea is that in 99% of the cases we just want the information we have already in the Smalltalk hierarchy.
Cheers, Doru
On 19 Apr 2010, at 20:04, Simon Denier wrote:
Hi
I notice that the following classes are not described in Fame. Now they are Group classes, so it's not so important as instances are dynamically created. However, MooseGroup and similar are described. So should we be consistent with the rule?
DudeDuplicationGroup DudeMultiplicationGroup FAMIXFileGroup FAMIXFolderGroup FAMIXGlobalVariableGroup FAMIXNamespaceGroup -- Simon
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Don't give to get. Just give."