Thank you, Alex.
Doru
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.comwrote:
I am quasi exclusively using the Moose image, which includes GTDebugger and GTInspector. These are two great tools. I use the standard Pharo 3.0 for particular needs only. When I do this, it is like using Nautilus and coming back to OB (or even the old standard browser).
GTDebugger and GTInspector are great. I like them.
Alexandre
On Dec 30, 2013, at 2:24 AM, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi,
Some of you asked how the GTInspector and GTDebugger are different from
the existing infrastructure. They are quite different from the norm in that: they are tiny, and they are highly extensible. Here are some posts that describe what makes them different:
http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/the-moldable-gtinspector-deconstructed...
http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/dissecting-the-gtinspector/
http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/extending-variables-shown-in-gtinspect...
http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/moldable-gtdebugger
These tools are already the default development tools in the Moose
image. As you can see, Moose is reshaping the Pharo IDE. I think this is exciting.
This should be just the beginning. To make it better, we need your
energy:
- Apply and extend these tools for your context (this is what makes them
unique).
- Tell us what works and what does not work.
- Ideally, start working with us on this topic. In particular, I am
looking for people that would like to spend some time working on Morphic widgets.
It's your turn now.
Cheers, Doru
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.