8 May
2013
8 May
'13
10:30 a.m.
this one is interesting.
Yes. Although I would not focus on rotating the text. Roassal gives more interaction mechanism than D3 (from
what I can see in the demo). Getting sexy way to get the name of nodes is not complex.
Yes because they did not think about it yet.
And I hope that they will not.
My point is that we have resources now so let us them because in 2 years from now I have
no idea how the situation will be
I think that
having more variation in trees would be good.
And the sugiyama algorithm too to minimize crossing.
Roassal has the Sugiyama algorithm.
Alexandre
stef
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
cheers -ben
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Or maybe I
will start looking at how to increase roassal scalability.
Just tell
Regards
Mathieu
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev