13 Dec
2007
13 Dec
'07
3:30 p.m.
My question was can we reuse what you did to speed up the
default Squeak Smalltalk parser. But I get that you speed up the mse
one.
Stef
On 12 déc. 07, at 21:01, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
On 12 Dec 2007, at 9:34 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Just because I would like to know for Squeak potential speed.
Why was the VW parser slower?
what kind of optimizations did you use?
The intermediate literal array falls away, now its
Text -> Parser -> some logic -> model objects
using Smalltalk parser its
Text -> Parser -> intermediate array -> some logic -> model objects
I guess Lukas's parser is the fastest you can get
AA
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Apparently this is no what I understood from the first
mse format.
Adrian's first implementation used a literal array representation
just to avoid to do the -TRUE- to true kind of conversion. Adrian
can
you comment on that?
The first prototype re-used the Smalltalk parser, right. Now we
use a
custom scanner / parser as this is faster.