My question was can we reuse what you did to speed up the default Squeak Smalltalk parser. But I get that you speed up the mse one.
Stef
On 12 déc. 07, at 21:01, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
On 12 Dec 2007, at 9:34 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Apparently this is no what I understood from the first mse format. Adrian's first implementation used a literal array representation just to avoid to do the -TRUE- to true kind of conversion. Adrian can you comment on that?
The first prototype re-used the Smalltalk parser, right. Now we use a custom scanner / parser as this is faster.
Just because I would like to know for Squeak potential speed. Why was the VW parser slower? what kind of optimizations did you use?
The intermediate literal array falls away, now its
Text -> Parser -> some logic -> model objects
using Smalltalk parser its
Text -> Parser -> intermediate array -> some logic -> model objects
I guess Lukas's parser is the fastest you can get
AA
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev