24 Apr
2010
24 Apr
'10
8:26 a.m.
On Apr 23, 2010, at 10:50 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
the problems is that numberOfAttributes is not the right vocabulary.
Did you check for the other ones if there is not already an equivalent?
Stef
I'm for
especially since we would like to be able to have pharo objects as metamodel instead of
FAMIX.
Indeed!!!
I would like to have numberOfMethods, numberOfLinesOfCode, numberOfAttributes defined in
Behavior. Stef, does this make sense? Shall I produce a slice
and put it PharoInbox?
Alexandre
Stef
On Apr 23, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev hi!
What about adding in FAMIXClass:
withAllSubclasses, allSubclasses, superclasses, withAllSuperclasses, allSuperclasses
FAMIXClass should be somewhat polymorphic to Behavior.
That would be useful... I can do it.
Any opinion?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev