25 Nov
2007
25 Nov
'07
3:17 p.m.
On 25 nov. 07, at 13:51, Tudor Girba wrote:
In the latest FAMIX proposed by Adrian, Package and
Namespaces are
both ScopedEntities. The reason for this is exactly to not clone the
code in both namespace and in package.
the problem is that Smalltalk package does not give any scope.
so I do not know. may be with the nulStrateg scope
stef
I am not sure that I like that though because the semantics of Package
is not the one of Scoped.
Doru
On Nov 25, 2007, at 1:39 PM, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
I'm about to write a new package reference plugin for moose.
Now I have to pay attention because of the way namespaces and
packages are orthogonal in Smalltalk.
I have a question:
when we will be loading java code in Moose what will be a Java
package?
a moose namespace or a moose package?
If this is a namespace then I will have certainly to duplicate the
logic in package and namespace and I would like
to avoid that. Does anybody have an idea how to avoid that?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"It's not how it is, it is how we see it."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev