14 May
2014
14 May
'14
8:21 a.m.
Excellent.
Thanks,
Doru
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Mircea Filip Lungu
<mircea.lungu(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Hi Doru,
So it's FAMIX!
I can take care of fixing that.
Cheers,
M.
2014-05-09 21:03 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>om>:
Hi,
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
superclass simply takes one of the super FAMIXClass objects. It would
indeed be better if we would take the first FAMIXClass that is not
interface.
I am offline until next week. Can someone else look into this?
Doru
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Mircea Filip Lungu <lungu(a)iam.unibe.ch>wrote;wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi guys!
We've been looking with Alex today at a model built with VerveineJ and
imported in Moose.
In the following example:
public class
<http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/net.sf.jung/jung-graph-impl/2.0.1/edu/uci/ics/jung/graph/OrderedKAryTree.java#>
OrderedKAryTree<V, E> extends
AbstractTypedGraph<http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/net.s…
<V, E> implements
Tree<http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/net.sf.jung/jung-ap…
<V, E>
If I obtain the object referring to the OrderedKAryTree and I call
superclass I get Tree instead of AbstractTypedGraph.
However, if I call directSuperclasses I get both Tree and
AbstractTypedGraph.
Is this normal behavior?
Thanks,
M.
* Code available at:
http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/net.sf.jung/jung-graph-impl…
--
Mircea Lungu, PhD.
Researcher
Software Composition Group
University of Bern
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev