6 May
2013
6 May
'13
5:25 a.m.
Thanks Jannik!
A general question: are there exiting things to do with Dsm? If you have to redo your phd,
would you take a different approach? If yes, which ones?
Alexandre
Le 4 mai 2013 à 15:39, "jannik.laval" <jannik.laval(a)gmail.com> a écrit :
On May 3, 2013, at 11:35 PM, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kubelka(a)gmail.com> wrote:
OK, thank you. Actually I am not reimplementing
it. My first goal is to remove Mondrian in the simplest and acceptable way it is possible.
Afterwards I can do better tools.
Nice !
Hope to see DSM implemented in Roassal soon :)
Jannik
Cheers,
Jura
2013/5/3 jannik.laval <jannik.laval(a)gmail.com>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi,
Really cool !
On May 3, 2013, at 5:51 PM, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kubelka(a)gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi!
I am almost done with porting DSM views into Roassal. There is several times (for
example: NumberColoredDSM>>contentOfSimplyCell:for:with:out:) used method
MOFilledStyle>>borderStyle: which is not supported by Roassal.
Just for sure: Is it obligatory for this views? Should I implement this feature in
Roassal?
The model should be changed to be more flexible, taking more than packages… So, I think
it is not necessary to reimplement it as it is, but making a better model beside DSM.
Thanks,
Jura
Cheers,
Jannik
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev