Thanks Jannik!
A general question: are there exiting things to do with Dsm? If you have to redo your phd, would you take a different approach? If yes, which ones?
Alexandre
Le 4 mai 2013 à 15:39, "jannik.laval" jannik.laval@gmail.com a écrit :
On May 3, 2013, at 11:35 PM, Juraj Kubelka juraj.kubelka@gmail.com wrote:
OK, thank you. Actually I am not reimplementing it. My first goal is to remove Mondrian in the simplest and acceptable way it is possible. Afterwards I can do better tools.
Nice ! Hope to see DSM implemented in Roassal soon :)
Jannik
Cheers, Jura
2013/5/3 jannik.laval jannik.laval@gmail.com
Hi,
Really cool !
On May 3, 2013, at 5:51 PM, Juraj Kubelka juraj.kubelka@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I am almost done with porting DSM views into Roassal. There is several times (for example: NumberColoredDSM>>contentOfSimplyCell:for:with:out:) used method MOFilledStyle>>borderStyle: which is not supported by Roassal.
Just for sure: Is it obligatory for this views? Should I implement this feature in Roassal?
The model should be changed to be more flexible, taking more than packages… So, I think it is not necessary to reimplement it as it is, but making a better model beside DSM.
Thanks, Jura
Cheers, Jannik
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev