Hi Simon,
I would suggest to add a FAMIXTrait and have the flattening mechanism
in the FAMIXClass>>methods.
Cheers,
Doru
On 23 Nov 2009, at 19:48, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
yeap!
Stef
On Nov 23, 2009, at 3:47 AM, Simon Denier wrote:
Hi there
I started to work on issue 227 and it is quite simple but
problematic. Basically when we send PackageInfo>>classes, it
returns regular classes and traits. There is no way to ask directly
for the regular classes.
Now since traits are flattened in their user classes, there is no
behavior lost if I ignore them in the importer (esp. since for now
there is no representation of traits in Famix).
With this in mind, I updated the Lan model to use a trait, with the
goal to not change the properties of the model and the tests.
But the tests break because the Lan package has one more 'class'
which is the trait.
Do I continue and update the tests to ignore the trait?
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster,
one might have better chances to win by moving slower."