3 Nov
2008
3 Nov
'08
11:34 p.m.
On Nov 3, 2008, at 21:11 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
On Nov 3, 2008, at 3:46 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
no
hani
I am not sure to have fully understood. The set
of isStub methods
defined on various FAMIX classes are important and are present in my
image.
The problem is that hani as well as doru in the past mixed the point
of isStub
and tried to infer the meaning of incomplete update.
Are you saying that they belongs to Cook and you
want make them
part of Moose? It would make sense to me.
I'm saying that isStub is different from a recursive
isCompletelyImported
and that both could be defined in Moose.
Hani do you have tests to cover your isStub definition?
Stef
Where can I see this #completelyImported ?
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 1 Nov 2008, at 07:07, stéphane ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi
I would really like to change the isStub code to reflect what is it
and that hani provide
us completelyImported methods for the model.
Is it ok?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev