I did not read this before, but now I’m interested.
Dory, when you say that 'the static parsers are significantly faster’ can you give some numbers on that? And you know what the numbers are compared to the compiled petitparsers of Jan and Jan ? (Their compiler is really cool BTW :-) I use it for LRP )
-- Does this mail seem too brief? Sorry for that, I don’t mean to be rude! Please see http://emailcharter.org .
Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD and RyCh labs - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
On Aug 19, 2016, at 07:02, stepharo stepharo@free.fr wrote:
Le 14/8/16 à 22:31, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Hi,
PetitParser is a dynamic parser. SmaCC is a static parser. Both have their usages, and the static parsers are significantly faster. The speed problem of PetitParser will likely be significantly improved once we get the work of Jan on compiling parsers.