19 Aug
2016
19 Aug
'16
2:50 p.m.
I did not read this before, but now I’m interested.
Dory, when you say that 'the static parsers are significantly faster’ can you give
some numbers on that? And you know what the numbers are compared to the compiled
petitparsers of Jan and Jan ? (Their compiler is really cool BTW :-) I use it for LRP )
--
Does this mail seem too brief? Sorry for that, I don’t mean to be rude! Please see
http://emailcharter.org .
Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD and RyCh labs - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
On Aug 19, 2016, at 07:02, stepharo
<stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
Le 14/8/16 à 22:31, Tudor Girba a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> PetitParser is a dynamic parser. SmaCC is a static parser. Both have their usages,
and the static parsers are significantly faster. The speed problem of PetitParser will
likely be significantly improved once we get the work of Jan on compiling parsers.