5 Dec
2013
5 Dec
'13
10:31 p.m.
You are making a very good point. the force based layout is a crucial layout and deserve
to be properly documented.
Starting from I will have plenty of times for Roassal. I will make sure this layout is
properly documented
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Dec 5, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk(a)me.com> wrote:
Hi guys. I am trying to understand how the force based
layout works. So there are charge: strength: and length: accessors. I understand how
charge works a bit, but changing length and strength didn’t give me any visible results.
Cheers.
Uko
P.S. maybe it’s reasonable to comment classes a bit? Because almost all layouts does not
have classes so when I want to layout my graph I end up in the middle of nowhere.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev