14 Nov
2011
14 Nov
'11
11:47 p.m.
It could be very useful in serialization because
sometimes you start traversing an object and you end up traversing much more objects you
wanted. So Mondrian could help to find the problematic objects.
Visualization is cool indeed
It would be great to have the ability of affecting the
parent graph of a node, not just the subgraph of a node.
+1
This goes against some principles in Mondrian (e.g., zOrdering different than object
nesting).
I tried the following:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| n |
n := OrderedCollection new.
view shape rectangle withText.
view interaction on: MOMouseDown do: [ :ann |
n add: (MONode on: 'hello').
view root addNode: n last.
(MOGridLayout forNodes: n) applyOn: ann node root.
view root resetCache; updateWindow ].
view node: 'press me'
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Additionally, it would be nice to express the graph
more concisely. I am a newbie in Mondrian so maybe it has not sense what I imagine
(following the example with Collection hierarchy):
view shape expandableNode childrenNodesWith: [:aNodeToExpand | aExpandableNode
subclasses].
view node: Collection.
view edgesFrom: #superclass.
is it possible to add only the root at first and the rest when nodes expand?
Humm... Hardly feasible without completely bypassing many things Mondrian was designed
for.
However, I am currently working on Roassal, a new visualization framework with a strong
emphasis on interaction. What you are asking for will be trivial to do.
Alexandre
On 14 Nov 2011, at 17:30, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Martin, are you happy with what Mondrian offers
currently? Is there anything else you would like to see?
Alexandre
On 8 Nov 2011, at 15:50, Martin Dias wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Reasonable is what we are accustomed with."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Johan and Alexandre: Thank you, was funny to play
with Mondrian Easel and to see AspectMaps.
Doru: You was right, I had in mind something like a tree. I made a proof script using
blocks for recursion... look:
| blockForClass blockForExpandable blockForLeaf |
blockForClass := [:aClass |
blockForLeaf value: aClass.
aClass subclasses do: [:aSubclass |
(aSubclass subclasses isEmpty
ifTrue: [blockForLeaf]
ifFalse: [blockForExpandable])
value: aSubclass ] ].
blockForLeaf := [:aClass |
view shape label text: #name.
view node: aClass.
view edgesFrom: #superclass.
view horizontalTreeLayout ].
blockForExpandable := [:aClass |
view interaction
whenClickingUpdateNode: [:x | blockForClass value: x ]
withLayoutUpdate: true.
view shape rectangle
dashedBorder;
size: 10;
borderColor: Color lightGray.
view node: aClass.
view edgesFrom: #superclass.
view horizontalTreeLayout ].
blockForClass value: Collection.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
I think Martin was asking for a script that would add nodes to the parent graph, not to
the inner graph of a selected node.
The idea is to have an expandable graph that would behave similarly to a tree morph
widget (when you expand a node, the whole tree becomes larger).
Cheers,
Doru
On 8 Nov 2011, at 04:28, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > During Smalltalks conference, we started with
Mariano and Doru to do an experiment: to use Mondrian to visualize the graph that is being
serialized with Fuel.
Cool!
> 1) Is it fine how I installed Mondrian?
>
> Gofer it
> squeaksource: 'Mondrian';
> package: 'ConfigurationOfMondrian';
> load.
> (ConfigurationOfMondrian project latestVersion) load.
Yes.
> 2) For large graphs, I would like to show them lazily, maybe drawing some expandable
nodes (+). Do you understand what I mean? Is that possible?
Try this in an easel:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
view shape rectangle size: 20.
view interaction action: #inspect.
view interaction
whenEnteringUpdateNode: [:node |
view interaction forwarder.
view nodes: (Set allSubclasses).
view interaction forwarder.
view edgesFrom: #superclass..
view treeLayout
]
whenLeavingUpdateNode: [:node | ]
withLayoutUpdate: true.
view nodes: (1 to: 3)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Not knowing how to do something is not an argument for how it cannot be
done."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev