On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Tudor Girba tudor@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi,
Roassal was certainly not done out of performance reasons, but due to lack of flexibility in terms of animation :).
Ok, then I didn't understand it correctly :).
Doru
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 9, 2013, at 9:43, Usman Bhatti usman.bhatti@gmail.com wrote:
The numbers I got on my machine (MacBookPro 2,3GHz i7):
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.comwrote:
Hi!
I've just integrated the fix of Mathieu.
1.395 : Integrated optimization from Mathieu. Excellent job! [| view | view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new. view nodes: Object withAllSubclasses. view edgesFrom: #superclass. view treeLayout. view applyLayout ] timeToRun => 91856 before this version => 48519 with this version
==> 78380 With old Mondrian: ==> 42625
That's strange because for me one of the purposes of building Roassal was to improve performance but the numbers are suggesting contrary.
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev