1 Aug
2015
1 Aug
'15
4:38 p.m.
+1
Le 1 août 2015 à 10:25, Tudor Girba
<tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> a écrit :
Yes. It's was the reuse of the presentation. But, feel free to modify it :). Your
suggestion sounds better.
Cheers,
Doru
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Peter Uhnák
<i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe the zooming...
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Peter Uhnák
<i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Why is TRCanvas rendered in inspector using RTView?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TRCanvas>>gtInspectorViewIn: composite
<gtInspectorPresentationOrder: -10>
composite roassal2
title: 'Canvas';
initializeView: [ RTView new setCanvas: self ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
shouldn't this be isolated from Roassal layer?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TRCanvas>>gtInspectorCanvasIn: composite
<gtInspectorPresentationOrder: -20>
composite morph
title: 'Canvas';
morph: [
self buildMorph.
self morph ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Peter
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev