Yet another advantage is that Fame is maintained :).
And it's not necessarily the code generator, but that we have exporters in several languages so that it is really easy to have data in Moose from Java.
Cheers, Doru
On Jun 13, 2008, at 8:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
may be one advantage is that we may use fame to generate famix model in other languages. But do we need that?
Stef On Jun 13, 2008, at 8:28 PM, stephane ducasse wrote:
I'm contemplating morbidly Meta and I was wondering why do we need to have EMOF for what we do at the meta-metamodel. It seems to me that we lost our soul in the process and especially now that nobody maintain the metapart. I have large doubts.
I run the test of meta dn 59 are breaking ;(
I'm considering porting FAMIX2.1 to Squeak. I will call the class FAMIX2Class.
Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Problem solving efficiency grows with the abstractness level of problem understanding."