23 Apr
2014
23 Apr
'14
1:54 p.m.
Hi,
Ideally, the only thing that should be shared is an object that accumulates
like a stream. You should be able to pass the view from builder to builder
and it should ideally work.
Right now, the view plays that role. However, the view is not (yet)
scope-able. For example, imagine that I would like to build a graph using
the graph builder and each node should display a chart using GraphET. For
this to work, we would need to pass to GraphET an object that can construct
the view only inside (or related to) a node. At the moment I cannot really
do that.
Doru
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Alexandre Bergel
<alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>wrote;wrote:
Maybe. The builder infrastructure is still very young.
We need to build
more builders (!) to understand what the proper interface should be…
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Apr 21, 2014, at 8:11 PM, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kubelka(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
I have an impression that we could create class
AbstractBuilder or
ProtoBuilder where we could have all the methods which all
builders should
understand. For example addElementOn:, addElementsOn:, view, view:, etc. I
think it could be useful documentation for someone who wants to create new
builder.
It could be also useful if someone decide to compose builders.
What do you thing? Does it have sense?
Cheers,
Jura
El 21-04-2014, a las 18:24, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>
escribió:
>> But, you should give it a try to extend the inspector for your own
needs
:). For example, let's play with what would be needed for debugging a
view. What do you say?
>
> The inspector could be aware of the builder.
> This is something what has to be well oiled to support nice demos. We
will
work on this on some point. FYI, we have extended the GTInspector to
support different visualization of the tallies. We will announce it soon.
>
> Alexandre
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:
Hi!
Doru, would it make sense to have RTBuilder>>build returns the view?
Like that, there is no need of the last line in:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| b |
b := RTGraphBuilder new.
…
b build.
b view
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev