9 Sep
2014
9 Sep
'14
1:19 p.m.
I cannot reproduce the problem too, with two simple subclasses of
MooseModel:
ModelSub1 new
add: (FAMIXClass new
name: 'toto' ;
mode: 'inMode' ;
yourself
) ;
asMSEString
==>
'(
(FAMIX.Class (id: 1)
(name ''toto'')
(mode ''inMode'')))'
ModelSub2 new
add: (FAMIXClass new
name: 'toto' ;
mode: 'inMode' ;
yourself
) ;
asMSEString
==> '(
(FAMIX.Class (id: 1)
(name ''toto'')
(mode ''inMode'')))'
So, the problem should be in your Parameter, ModelSub1 or ModelSub2
classes, but I think that not in fame.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <nicolas.anquetil(a)inria.fr>
wrote:
So still in the same image, and for the same metamodel (AFAIK)
ModelSub1 metaTower
gives an object where 'metamodel' is a dictionnary with the 'mode'
FM3Property in
ModelSub2 metaTower
gives an object where 'metamodel' is a dictionnary without the 'mode'
FM3Property
?!?!?!
any suggestion?
nicolas
On 08/09/2014 18:19, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
It is getting very weird:
I have a subtype of MooseModel for which it works:
ModelSub1 new
add: (Parameter new
name: 'toto' ;
mode: 'inMode' ;
yourself
) ;
asMSEString
--->
((Parameter (id: 1)
(name 'toto')
(mode 'inMode')))
and yet another subtype (in the same image) of this one for which it does
not work:
ModelSub2 new
add: (Parameter new
name: 'toto' ;
mode: 'inMode' ;
yourself
) ;
asMSEString
--->
((Parameter (id: 1)
(name 'toto')))
There is nothing to me in the methods added by ModelSub2 that would
justify changing the behavior of MSE exporting.
I am currently tracing in // the 2 instructions above.
And I do see that the meta description does not include the 'mode'
property for the ModelSub2
but why ???
nicolas
On 08/09/2014 16:41, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
I cannot reproduce the problem.
Here is what I did:
FAMIXClass
compile: 'mode
<MSEProperty: #mode type: #String>
^ mode';
compile: 'mode: aString
mode := aString'.
MooseModel resetMeta.
cls := FAMIXClass new mode: 'test'.
model := MooseModel new.
model add: cls.
model asMSEString
==>
(
(FAMIX.Class (id: 1)
(mode 'test')))
Cheers,
Doru
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <
nicolas.anquetil(a)inria.fr> wrote:
--
Andre Hora
nope
I did set it and I checked it in the model
nicolas
On 08/09/2014 15:20, Tudor Girba wrote:
Could it be that it is nil?
Doru
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <
nicolas.anquetil(a)inria.fr> wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing
listMoose-dev@iam.unibe.chhttps://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing
listMoose-dev@iam.unibe.chhttps://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
I defined a new property:
mode
<MSEProperty: #mode type: #String>
<MSEComment: 'The mode (input/output) for this parameter'>
^ mode
I reinitialized the meta model
I set the property for an entity
but the property is not exported in "model asMSEString" :-(
any suggestion?
nicolas
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing
listMoose-dev@iam.unibe.chhttps://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev