9 Aug
2013
9 Aug
'13
2:20 p.m.
Hi,
Roassal was certainly not done out of performance reasons, but due to lack of flexibility
in terms of animation :).
Doru
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 9, 2013, at 9:43, Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The numbers I got on my machine (MacBookPro 2,3GHz
i7):
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:
Hi!
I've just integrated the fix of Mathieu.
1.395 : Integrated optimization from Mathieu. Excellent job!
[| view |
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new.
view nodes: Object withAllSubclasses.
view edgesFrom: #superclass.
view treeLayout.
view applyLayout ] timeToRun
=> 91856 before this version
=> 48519 with this version
==> 78380
With old Mondrian:
==> 42625
That's strange because for me one of the purposes of building Roassal was to improve
performance but the numbers are suggesting contrary.
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev