26 Jan
2010
26 Jan
'10
4:30 p.m.
It looks really really cool! I am glad to see what people can do with
Moose/Glamour/Mondrian. This is an excellent illustration!
Alexandre
On 26 Jan 2010, at 12:14, Johan Fabry wrote:
On 25 Jan 2010, at 14:44, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
I use the have the traditional ones:
width = #numberOfAttributes
height = #numberOfMethods
color = #numberOfLinesOfCode
OK, thanks!
Regarding my goals, it really depends on the
situation.
Yes, well that's kind of obvious, no? ;-) That's why I asked in the
plural.
Anyways, I think that in AspectMaps I will just keep the above
metrics plus weightedMethodCount because it sounds cool :-P, and the
amount of join point shadows.
FYI: a pic of the current state of AspectMaps. I dont have time this
week to make new screenshots and movies, and from next week I am
away from the computer until the end of feb, so I will do those
things when I am back ...
<AM.tiff>
--
Johan Fabry
jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl - http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev