29 Apr
2011
29 Apr
'11
1:06 a.m.
Hummmm, I am not convinced yet :-(
The argument of preservation of behaviour as some strength, but still verveinej is not
infusion.
And above all, I believe the proposed behaviour is more flexible and powerful.
You can very simply have the old behaviour just by doing "cd project-root ; verveinej
."
And you can have full paths, or paths relative to some other place than the project root.
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
De: "Tudor Girba"
<tudor.girba(a)gmail.com>
À: "Moose-related development" <moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch>
Cc: codesite-noreply(a)google.com
Envoyé: Vendredi 29 Avril 2011 00:03:22
Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Issue 603 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should export relative
paths
Hi Nicolas,
I gave full path as argument, but even if I give relative path I do
not want to see it in the MSE file.
In Moose, we always relate the file anchor path to a root folder.
For example:
verveinej.sh -- Annotations/
results in a path like:
"Annotations/src/layout/SpringUtilities.java"
but, I only want "src/layout/SpringUtilities.java" (without the
trailing "/")
Like that, the model is movable in other locations without a problem
without having to think about how to invoke the parser. It only
depends on the root folder, and this folder can be renamed after the
fact.
We have the same convention in inFusion and it works well. From what
it sounds, you already add this information explicitly in VerveineJ,
so it would not be difficult to take out.
Cheers,
Doru
On 28 Apr 2011, at 23:50, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
Not sure about this one.
On my computer, it does output relative path.
Only they are not really relative to the input folder, but relative
to the argument you gave to verveinej:
so if you say:
verveinej.sh ../some/path/to/java/project
all path in the file anchors will start with
"../some/path/to/java/project"
I think it is more conveniant because you can still have relative
path if you want, you only need to give them relative when you call
verveinej
and you can also get absolute paths if needed by giving absolute
paths as argument ...
Did you give fullpaths as arguments?
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Value is always contextual."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev De: moose-technology(a)googlecode.com
À: moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
Envoyé: Jeudi 28 Avril 2011 23:40:37
Objet: [Moose-dev] Issue 603 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should
export relative paths
Status: New
Owner: ----
CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ
New issue 603 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ should export
relative
paths
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=603
Currently, VerveineJ exports the FileAnchors with full path. It
should
export it with the path relative to the input folder.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev